Views on the effectiveness and impact of the community and voluntary sector social justice advocacy work varied.
- The majority of community and voluntary sector organisations (69%) rated their social justice advocacy as either effective or very effective (Mapping Study, 2012), while the majority surveyed in the initial project report awarded themselves a score of three out of five for effectiveness (where five was very effective and one was ineffective).
- The case studies (developed as part of the mapping study) highlighted the importance of clear narrow focus and sophisticated advocacy strategy as well as a number of other issues as predictors of effectiveness.
Factors that contribute to effective social justice advocacy work |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy-makers and influencers commenting on the differences in effectiveness between social justice advocacy organisations all clearly linked effectiveness to a number of key characteristics such as:
Policy-makers’ perceptions of the characteristics of effective social justice advocacy |
|
Characteristics of Effective Social Justice Advocacy |
Characteristics of Ineffective Social Justice Advocacy |
Being genuinely representative with a clear mandate from the individuals/groups represented |
The absences of a clear mandate |
Combine being representative and professional with having clear engagement strategies with policy-makers |
Outrage – without solutions (often linked to a lack of realism) |
Building relationships with people in the system and work to feed into the system |
A general absence of energy and enthusiasm, linked to negative attitudes and approaches |
Being solution focused |
Negative attitudes and approaches |
Being responsive and innovative |
Being unresponsive, with a lack of innovative thinking and action |
Working collectively |
A lack of awareness and understanding of how policy/decision making processes work |
Source: ‘In Other Words’: Policy-makers’ perceptions of social justice advocacy (2013) |
Areas where there were less consensus and more divergent views about what is effective advocacy included:
- The use of ‘outsider’ strategies (including engagement with general public and the use of media) was seen by some to be very effective and by others to be destructive (of relationships with policy-makers).
- Combining an advocacy function with the service provision function was perceived by some to be essential to effective advocacy, while others were happy for these functions to be independent. Some identified the risk of bring both an ‘insider’ providing services on behalf of the state and an ‘outsider’ critiquing the role of the state.
- The ability to produce focused and timely research that could be fed into the formation of policy was seen by some to be critical to effective advocacy, while for others this was less important than the effective delivery of services.
In order to address the issue of effectiveness and capacity we developed two tools, Assess Your Advocacy and Are we getting there? - A tool for identifying evaluation indicators for social justice advocacy. These are designed to help community and voluntary organisations measure their advocacy capacity and have an important contribution to make in relation to measuring the effectiveness of particular organisations social justice advocacy work.